SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
MOTION to Compel (CANCELED)05/31/2007 - 09:30 05/31/2007 - 10:30 US/Central IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E360INSIGHT, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, Defendant. MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiffs, e360lnsight, LLC and David Linhardt (collectively Plaintiffs), by and through their attorneys, Synergy Law Group, LLC, respectfully requests that this Court Compel The Spamhaus Project, aka The Spamhaus Project Ltd., (Defendant) to comply with this Court's Order of March 20, 2006. In support of this motion Plaintiffs state: 1. On March 15, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a Rule to Show Cause as to why Defendant had not provided Plaintiffs with information concerning Spamhaus Technology, LTD. A copy of the Motion is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. At a hearing on the Motion, this Court denied the Motion but directed Defendant to "respond to all reasonable questions". A copy of the Order is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 3. Defendant has not complied with this Court's Order. 4. On March 26, 2007, counsel for Plaintiffs wrote to counsel for Defendant seeking information related to Spamhaus Technology, LTD. A copy of the letter is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 6. Counsel for Defendant responded by letter stating that Defendant would only provide the office address of Sparnhaus Technology, LTD, a list of officers, board members, investors and owners of Spamhaus Technology, LTD and the charter for Spamhaus Technology, LTD. A copy of the letter is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 7. To date, Defendant has only provided the address of Spamhaus Technology, a list of names under the heading of officers, board members, investors and owners of Spamhaus Technology, LTD without identifying the capacity of the individuals, and, the Spamhaus Technology, LTD Charter. 8. The information sought by Plaintiffs is reasonable in Plaintiffs' attempt to ascertain the connection between Defendant and Spamhaus Technology, LTD and to discovery potential assets that could be used to satisfy the judgment entered against Defendant. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, e360Insight, LLC and David Linhardt, respectfully request that this Court enter an Order Compelling Defendant to fully comply with this Court's Order by providing Plaintiffs with the following information concerning Spamhaus Technology, LTD: and sanction Defendant in the amount of Plaintiffs' reasonable attorney's fees in connection with bringing this motion. Respectfully submitted, E360lrisight, LLC. and David Linhardt By: /s/ Daniel J. Peters Bartly J. Loethen
|
Upcoming Dates
Navigatione360insight LLC, et al. v. The Spamhaus Project LLC, et al.User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment