SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
ComplaintI would OCR this form, but it's a fill-in-the-blanks with a few checkboxes scattered through. That makes it not really worth the time. The only things of interest are found on page 2. There, Ms. Thomson states that she is suing the Congressman for $2000 under California's Anti-Spam Law. Or, rather I'm guessing that's what it says. The scan makes it look like it says "California Anty Spam Law". Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationThomson v. Doolittle [DISMISSED]User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment