SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
NOTICE of AppealUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOTICE OF APPEAL USCA 8 NO ______________________ United States of America, 05-282 (MJD/JJG) District Court Docket Number Notice is given that Christopher Smith appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the Judgment & Commitment Order entered in this action on August 6, 2007. s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez 300 South Fourth Street 612-664-5858 Minneapolis, MN 55415 August 16, 2007 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM x Please Prepare a transcript of: 9 I am not ordering a transcript because CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Method of Payment: ___ Funds, X Authorization sent to reporter. Attorney's Signature s/ Katherine M. Menendez Date August 16, 2007 NOTE: Complete All Items on Following Page(s) -2- 1. Defendant's Address: Christopher William Smith 2. Date of Verdict: November 22, 2006 Jury X Non-Jury __ Offenses: Aiding and abetting unlawful distribution and dispensing of controlled substances. Aiding and abetting introduction of misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, conspiracy to commit money laundering. 21 USC 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(D); 21 CFR 1306.04; 18 USC 2; 21 USC 331(a), 333(a)(2), 353(b)(1), 18 USC 1956(h), 21 USC 848(a) and (c) Trial Testimony Number of Days: 22 Bail Status: Detained 3. Date & Sentence Imposed: August 1, 2007 / 360 months 4. Appealing: Sentence __ Conviction __ Both X Challenging: __ Application of Sentencing Guidelines __ Constitutionality of Guidelines X Both Application and Constitutionality 5. Date Transcript ordered by Counsel or District Court: August 16, 2007 6. Current Counsel Was: x Appointed (no fee required) ___ Retained (filing fee $105 unless IFP granted) Does Defendant's financial status warrant appointment of counsel on appeal? X Yes __ No Affidavit of Financial Status filed: N/A Is there any reason why current counsel should not be appointed as counsel on appeal? __ Yes X No 7. Assistant U.S. Attorney Name and Phone Number: James Alexander and Nicole Engisch Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationU.S. v. Smith (Rizler)User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment