SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
ComplaintUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. SILT NEUTRACEUTICALS, LLC, and COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), for its Complaint alleges as follows: 1. The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and under Section 7(a) of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 ("CAN-SPAM"), 15 U.S.C. § 7706(a), to obtain injunctive relief and other equitable relief for Defendants' deceptive and unfair acts or practices and the making of false advertisements in violation of Sections 5 and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 and 52, and for violations of CAN-SPAM, 15 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq. -2- 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 52, 53(b), 57h, 7706(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a) and 1345. 3. Venue in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois is proper under 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) and 28 U.S.G. § 1391 (b) and (c). PLAINTIFF 4. Plaintiff FTC is an independent agency of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. §§ 41-58. The Commission enforces Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 52, which prohibit, respectively, deceptive or unfair acts or practices and false advertisements for food, drugs, devices, services, or cosmetics, in or affecting commerce. The FTC is also charged with enforcing CAN-SPAM as if statutory violations of CAN-SPAM "were an unfair or deceptive act or practice proscribed under Section 18(a)(1)(B) of the [FTC Act] (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B))." 15 U.S.C. § 7706(a). 5. Sections 13(b) and 19 of the FTC Act authorize the FTC to initiate federal district court proceedings, in its own name by its designated attorneys, to enjoin violations of any provision of law enforced by the FTC, and to secure such equitable relief as may be appropriate in each case. 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b. DEFENDANTS 6. Defendant Sili Neutraceuticals, LLC is a limited liability company registered in Nevada. Sili Neutraceuticals has a registered office at 101 Convention Center Drive, #700, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109. -3- 7. Defendant Brian McDaid is the sole member of Sill Neutraceuticals, LLC. McDaid has formulated, directed, controlled, or participated in the acts or practices of Sili Neutraceuticals, LLC set forth in this Complaint. McDaid also does business as Kaycon, Ltd. 8. "Defendants" means Sili Neutraceuticals, LLC and Brian McDaid. Defendants have transacted business in the Northern District of Illinois within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. §53 (b). COMMERCE 9. At all times material to this Complaint, Defendants have maintained a substantial course of trade in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44. DEFINITIONS 10. "Electronic mail message" (or "email") means a message sent to a unique electronic mail address. 15 U.S.C. § 7702(6). 11. "Electronic mail address" means a destination, commonly expressed as a string of characters, consisting of a unique user name or mailbox (commonly referred to as the "local part") and a reference to an Internet domain (commonly referred to as the "domain part"), whether or not displayed, to which an electronic mail message can be sent or delivered. 15 U.S.C. § 7702(5). 12. "Commercial electronic mail message" means any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product -4- 13. "Header information" means the source, destination, and routing information attached to an electronic mail message, including the originating domain name and originating electronic mail address, and any other information that appears in the line identifying, or purporting to identify, a person initiating the message. 15 U.S.C. § 7702(8). 14. "Initiate," when used with respect to a commercial email message, means to originate or transmit such message or to procure the origination or transmission of such message. 15 U.S.C. § 7702(9). 15. "Procure," when used with respect to the initiation of a commercial email message, means intentionally to pay or provide other consideration to, or induce, another person to initiate such a message on one's behalf 15 U.S.C. § 7702(12). 16. "Protected Computer" means a computer which is used in interstate or foreign commerce or communication, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States. 15 U.S.C. 7702(13). 17. "Sender" means a person who initiates a commercial email message and whose product, service, or Internet Web site is advertised or promoted by the message. 15 U.S.C. § 7702(16). DEFENDANTS' BUSINESS ACTIVITIES 18. Since at least August 2004, and continuing to the present, Defendants have marketed and sold a variety of herbal or "natural" supplement products. One line of products marketed 19. Defendants have marketed their products by initiating commercial email messages. The primary purpose of these commercial email messages has been the commercial advertisement or promotion of Internet Web sites operated for a commercial purpose by Defendants. Particularly, the text of the commercial email messages contains hyperlinks to Web sites at which consumers can order Defendants' products. 20. Defendants have advertised, offered for sale, sold and/or distributed their products throughout the United States via dozens of Internet Web sites. Some of the Web sites Defendants have used to market their products are: www.kg-hood.com, www.forbefore.com, and www.iveboughtthisandamhappy.com. Consumers may purchase Defendants' products by credit card from Defendants' Web sites. 21. To induce consumers to purchase HoodiaHerbal, Defendants' Web sites make the following statements, among others: * * * About HoodiaHerbal Scientists have recently isolated several compounds in this amazing plant that are responsible for dramatic weight loss. This all-natural appetite suppressant is also being applauded for containing no dangerous stimulants that caused adverse side effects associated with weight loss products of the last decade. Advantages Our sustained release formula helps you reach your optimal weight zone, the continued weight loss will pace itself to allow your body and metabolism to adjust to your new weight. The sustained release slowly releases the powerful Hoodia into your system so the effects last all day. This balance is crucial to maintaining your weight-loss and keeping those unwanted inches off. _.and HoodiaHerbalT" is proven to do exactly just that so you can KEEP THE WEIGHT OFF PERMANENTLY -7- Hoodia is the most advanced (and by far the most successful) weight loss formula ever created, for one simple reason ... it simply causes you to have less of an appetite, and eat less. Studies have proven time and time again that users of hoodia lose weight, an average of 1-3 pounds per week, but as high as 20-44 pounds a month in many participants. There is no more effective product on the market, if you're looking to lose weight quickly yet SAFELY, and naturally ... and the results speak for themselves, with over 94% of users reporting significant weight loss within the first two weeks of usage. 24. To induce consumers to purchase Perfect HGH and Dr-HGH, Defendants' Web sites make the following statements: Q. How does " HGH" work: Q. What benefits will I first see and how long will it take? You Can't Change the Fact that You're Getting Older But You Can Change the Way You Look and Feel! HGH is Being Compared to the Eternal Fountain of Youth! Imagine Looking and Feeling 20 Years Younger! H\"G"\H [is] the only substance on earth proven by science to stall (and in many cases even reverse) the aging process, from wrinkles, to fat gain and muscle loss, to cellulite, to hair loss and decreased sexual libido/performance ... this simple little pill causes your body to produce more natural HGH, after just a week or two of usage, and helps your body (and mind!) look and feel 5-10-15 years younger! 26. Defendants "initiate" a commercial email message when they have either originated or transmitted a message themselves or have procured the origination or transmission of a message through payments or other consideration, or inducements. 27. Defendants are "senders" with respect to a commercial email message when they have initiated a message and it is Defendants' Web sites that are being advertised or promoted by such message. -9- 29. In order to induce consumers to open and read their commercial emails, Defendants have initiated commercial email messages that contain subject headers that misrepresent the content or subject matter of the message. 30. Defendants' commercial email messages fail to include any notification to recipients of their ability to decline receiving future email messages from Defendants, and they fail to include a reply email address or other mechanism that recipients can use to decline receiving future email messages from Defendants. 31. Defendants have initiated commercial email messages that failed to include a valid physical postal address of the sender. VIOLATIONS OF THE FTC ACT 32. Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. Section 12(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 52(a), prohibits the dissemination of any false advertisement in or affecting commerce for the purpose of inducing, or which is likely to induce, the purchase of food, drugs, devices, services or cosmetics. For the purpose of Section 12 of the FTC Act, the Hoodia 33. As set forth below, Defendants have engaged in unlawful practices in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act in connection with the marketing and/or sale of the Hoodia and HGH Products. COUNT I Through the means described in Paragraphs 18-23 above, Defendants have represented, expressly or by implication, that: In truth and in fact: 36. Therefore, Defendants' representations as set forth in Paragraph 34 above are false or misleading and constitute a deceptive practice, and the making of false advertisements, in or affecting commerce, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 52. COUNT II 37. Through the means described in Paragraphs 18-23 above, Defendants have represented, expressly or by implication, that: 38. Defendants did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations made in Paragraph 37 above at the time the representations were made. Therefore, the making of the representations set forth in Paragraph 37 above constitutes a deceptive practice, and the making of false advertisements, in or affecting commerce, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 52. -12- 39. Through the means described in Paragraphs 18-20, 24, and 25 above, Defendants have represented, expressly or by implication, that the HGH Products: 40. In truth and in fact, Defendants' HGH Products: 41. Therefore, Defendants' representations as set for in Paragraph 39 above are false or misleading and constitute a deceptive practice, and the making of false advertisements, in or affecting commerce, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 (a) and 52. -13- 42. Through the means described in Paragraphs 18-20, 24, and 25 above, Defendants have represented, expressly or by implication, that their HGH Products: 43. Defendants did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations made in Paragraph 42 above at the time the representations were made. Therefore, the making of the representations set forth in Paragraph 42 above constitutes a deceptive practice, and the making of false advertisements, in or affecting commerce, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 52. VIOLATIONS OF THE CAN-SPAM ACT 44. CAN-SPAM became effective on January 1, 2004, and has since remained in full force and effect. 45. Section 5(a)(1) of CAN-SPAM, 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(1), states: -14- 47. Section 5(a)(2) of CAN-SPAM, 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(2), states: 48. Section 7(e) of CAN-SPAM, 15 U.S.C. § 7706(e), states that in any action to enforce compliance through an injunction with Section 5(a)(2) and other specified sections of CAN-SPAM, the FTC need not allege or prove the state of mind required by such sections. 49. Section 5(a)(3) of CAN-SPAM, § 7704(a)(3) states: 50. Section 5(a)(5)(A) of CAN-SPAM, § 7704(a)(5)(A) states: 51. Section 7(a) of CAN-SPAM, 15 U.S.C. § 7706(a), states: COUNT V 52. In numerous instances, Defendants have initiated the transmission, to protected computers, of commercial email messages that contained, or were accompanied by, header information that is materially false or materially misleading. 53. Defendants' acts or practices, as described in paragraph 52 above, violate 15 U.S.C. § 7704(a)(1). COUNT VI 54. In numerous instances, Defendants have initiated the transmission, to protected computers, of commercial email messages that contained subject headings that would be 55. Defendants' acts or practices, as described in paragraph 54 above, violate 15 U.S.C. §7704 (a)(2). COUNT VII 56. In numerous instances, Defendants have initiated the transmission, to protected computers, of commercial email messages that advertise or promote Defendants' Internet Web sites, products or services, and do not include: 57. Defendants' acts or practices, as described in paragraph 56 above, violate 15 U.S.C. § 7704 (a)(5)(A)(ii) and/or § 7704(a)(3). -17- 58. Defendants have initiated the transmission, to protected computers, of commercial messages that advertise or promote Defendants' Internet Web sites, products or services and do not include the senders' valid physical postal address. 59. Defendants' acts or practices, as described in paragraph 56 above, violate 15 U.S.C § 7744(a)(5)(A)(iii). CONSUMER INJURY 60. Consumers in the United States and beyond have suffered, and continue to suffer, loss and other injury as a result of Defendants' unlawful acts or practices. In addition, Defendants have been unjustly enriched as a result of their unlawful practices. Absent injunctive and other equitable relief by this Court, Defendants are likely to continue to injure consumers, reap unjust enrichment, and harm the public interest. THIS COURT'S POWER TO GRANT RELIEF 61. Sections 13(b) and 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, empower this Court to grant injunctive and other ancillary equitable relief to prevent and remedy Defendants' violations of the FTC Act, and in exercise of its equitable jurisdiction, to award redress to remedy the injury to individuals and businesses, to order the disgorgement of monies resulting from Defendants' unlawful acts or practices, and to order other ancillary equitable relief. A violation of CAN-SPAM may be remedied in the same manner as as a violation of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7706. -18- PRAYER FOR RELIEF 1. Award Plaintiff such preliminary injunctive and ancillary relief as may be necessary to avert the likelihood of consumer injury during the pendency of this action and to preserve the possibility of effective final relief, including, but not limited to, temporary and preliminary injunctions and an order freezing assets; 2. Enter a permanent injunction to prevent future violations of the FTC Act and the CAN-SPAM Act by defendants; 3. Award such relief as the Court finds necessary to redress injury to consumers resulting from Defendants' violations of the FTC Act and the CAN-SPAM Act, including, but not limited to, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, and the disgorgement of ill-gotten monies; and -19- Respectfully submitted, William Blumenthal Steven M. Wemikoff Federal Trade Commission Dated: August 13, 2007
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationFTC v. Sili Neutraceuticals, Inc., et al. [DEFAULT]User loginRecent comments
|
top brands
top brands make it all but imposable to unsubscribe. i have been unsubscribing to thier crap for a week and still recieve 15 to 20 emails aday from them. they caught me with fly paper. it was something that i was interested in and when clicked upon it subscribed me to hundereds of ds that i had no interest at all in. top brands should have thier equipment confiscated and they should be burned at the stake.
Post new comment