SpamSuite.com
A Document Repository for Spam-Related Legal Documents
SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyright Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
e360Insight LLC, et al. v. Ferguson, et al. (III) [DISMISSED]Not content to only launch a goofball suit against Comcast last week, David Linhardt, by and through e360Insight LLC, is suing Mark Ferguson, Susan Wilson, and Kelly Chien for a third time. Suit was filed on January 18, 2008. This lawsuit alleges defamation, tortious interference with a prospective business advantage, and tortious interference with a contract. In other words: "WAAAAAAA! THEY SAID MEAN THINGS ABOUT ME IN PUBLIC!" This suit was dismissed, with prejudice, on June 4, 2008.
|
Upcoming Dates
 Navigatione360Insight LLC, et al. v. Ferguson, et al. (III) [DISMISSED]User loginRecent comments
Syndicate |
Next Action Foreseen
I have a report indicating that Synergy Law Group are currently contemplating an action under the following caption:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited
Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT,
an individual,
Plaintiffs,
v.
John Does 1 through 301,139,947,
individuals, Citizens of the
United States, Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR DAMAGES Plaintiffs, e360lnsight, LLC (e360) and David Linhardt (Linhardt) (collectively "Plaintiffs"), by and through their attorneys, Synergy Law Group, LLC, for their Complaint against Defendants, John Does 1 through 301,139,947, all citizens of the United States, (collectively "Defendants"), state as follows:
NATURE OF THIS ACTION
1. This is an action by e360, an internet marketing company, and Linhardt, its President, for damages against Defendants, each of whom have repeatedly refused to buy counterfeit designer sunglasses from Plaintiff, and who have further tortiously refused to read and respond to Plaintiff's repeated emails.
Post new comment