Support the SiteLinks and Supporters |
MOTION to DismissI guess the money for all of this litigation is starting to run low. e360 is cutting this lawsuit loose with a voluntary motion to dismiss WITH PREJUDICE (meaning that they cannot refile the case later if they change their minds). Paragraph 2 is particularly telling in this regard. They're dismissing the case after settling with only one of the three parties, rather than dismissing against the one party they settled with and continuing against the other two. E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT, an individual, v. MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual, SUSAN WILSON A.K.A. SUSAN GUNN, an individual, and KELLY CHIEN, an individual, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL NOW COMES the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter, e360Insight, LLC and David Linhardt, by and through their attorneys, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(b), moves this Honorable Court for entry of an order voluntarily dismissing their claim filed against Defendants with prejudice and in support thereof states as follows: 1. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) grants this Court the authority to dismiss this action on motion by Plaintiffs. 2. Plaintiffs have entered into a settlement agreement with Defendant Ferguson and attempted to resolve this matter through settlement with Defendants Wilson and Chien. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this honorable Court enter an Order dismissing this matter with prejudice. -2- By: /s/ Daniel J. Peters Joseph L. Kish
|
Subscribe to SpamsuiteUpcoming DatesNavigationUser loginRecent comments
|
Linhardt ran out of money
Linhardt filed for a protective order to prevent him from being deposed in California. Part of the reason is that he e360insight and Bargain Depot has a negative net worth.
Post new comment