Gordon v Virtumundo

9th Circuit decision

Here is the decision from the 9th Circuit.

Oral Arguments in the 9th Circuit

Here are the oral arguments in Gordon v. Virtumundo.

If you can read WMA files, then you should select that one as it is 1/9th the size of the MP3 format. It's also the original from the 9th Circuit's site.

For the convenience of those who cannot listen to WMA files I have converted it to MP3.

Supplemental Brief of Appellants in Response to Amicus Brief

It looks like the 9th Circuit is finally getting on the ECF bandwagon. That means that we'll be able to see filings on appeals in the 9th Circuit. Most of this case's appeal is not available through PACER, but stuff is starting to turn up now.

Here is a supplemental brief in the ancient Gordon v. Virtumundo case that James Gordon lost on standing issues.

Letter to Solicitor General

The following is the text of a letter sent to the Solicitor General by the 9th Circuit.

ORDER on Motion to Award Fees and Costs

Here's a practice note for the attorneys out there that I know are reading this site: When you win and think you're going to get fees and costs, don't get greedy and double-check your math.

Why? Because there are some things that you don't really want a judge to say about you in a decision. Among those are these gems all of which are found in this Order granting the Defendants $111,440.00 in attorneys' fees and costs of court:

Moore Declaration in Support

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married
individual, d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM';
OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a
Washington limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware
corporation d/b/a
ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT
LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,
1-X,
Defendants.

DECLARATION OF SCOTT MOORE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

I, Scott Moore, declare and testify as follows:

Fitzgerald Declaration in Support

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married
individual, d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM';
OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a
Washington limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware
corporation d/b/a
ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT
LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES,
1-X,
Defendants.

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL FITZGERALD IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

REPLY to Response to Motion to Award Fees and Costs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual,
d/b/a ‘GORDONWORKS.COM’; OMNI
INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington limited
liability company,
Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware corporation
d/b/a ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT
LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES, 1-X,
Defendants.

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

-2-
I. INTRODUCTION

Gordon Affidavit in Opposition

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married
individual, , Omni Innovations, LLC
Plaintiff,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
SCOTT LYNN, an individual; and
JOHN DOES, I-X,
Defendants.

DECLARATION OF JAMES S. GORDON, JR. IN RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

James S. Gordon, Jr. declares as follows:

RESPONSE to Motion to Award Fees and Costs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE

JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married
individual; OMNI INNOVATIONS,
LLC., a Washington limited
liability company;
Plaintiffs,

v.

VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware
corporation, d/b/a
ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM;
SCOTT LYNN, an individual; and
JOHN DOES, I-X,
Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

Syndicate content