SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
USA v BrewerBrady MotionThis is pretty routine paperwork. They're looking for anything that could help their case, and the government is obligated to give it to them. It's called "Brady Material" after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (l963), the case that established this obligation on the government's part. ====================================== UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES C. BREWER MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE OF FAVORABLE EVIDENCE
Statement of Compliance with Local Criminal Rule 16.1IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES C. BREWER DEFENDANT JAMES C. BREWER’S STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL CRIMINAL RULE 16.1 Defendant JAMES C. BREWER, by the Federal Defender Program and its attorney, ROBERT D. SEEDER, pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 16.1 states as follows: 1. The government made delivery of its 16.1 material to defense counsel on July 17, 2007. 2. The delivery was from Assistant United States Attorney Rick Young.
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationUser login |
Recent comments
4 weeks 1 day ago
4 weeks 1 day ago
5 weeks 3 days ago
5 weeks 6 days ago
7 weeks 2 days ago
10 weeks 2 days ago
11 weeks 1 day ago
12 weeks 5 days ago
12 weeks 6 days ago
14 weeks 1 day ago