SpamSuite.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,

v.

SILl NEUTRACEUTICALS, LLC, and
BRIAN MCDAID, individually and doing
business as KAYCON LTD,
Defendants.

STIPULATED PRELlMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER WITH ASSET FREEZE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF

MINUTE entry before Judge David H. Coar on 8/22/2007:Status hearing continued to 8/27/2007 at 09:00 A.M.Mailed notice (pm, ) (Entered: 08/22/2007)

What do you do when someone from another place comes to your court, hat-in-hand and asks for a continuance?

Why you tell him "Find someone here and only communicate with me through local counsel or I'll strike your motion in 30 days. Your pick.", of course. It's called a Rule 83.15 letter after the local rule it references.

That rule states:

LR83.15. Local Counsel: Designation for Service

August 21, 2007

Honorable David H. Coar
United States District Court

Re: Federal Trade Commission v. Sili Neutraceuticals, TIC, and Brian McDaid
No. 07C4541

Dear Judge Coar:
I have been retained to represent the defendants Brian McDaid and Sili Neutraceuticals, LLC, in this FTC enforcement action assigned to your Honor. I have secured Mr. Wernikoff's permission to write directly to your Honor to address scheduling issues. Defendants are specifically requesting a continuance of the status conference scheduled for Wednesday, August 22, 2007, at 9:00 a.m.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff

v.

SILI NEUTRACEUTICALS, LLC, and
BRIAN MCDAID, individually and doing
business as KAYCON LTD,
Defendants.

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITH ASSET FREEZE, OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

v.

SILI NEUTRACEUTICALS, LLC, and
BRIAN MCDAID, individually and doing
business as KAYCON LTD,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM SUPPORTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PASTE MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITH ASSET FREEZE, OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE

1. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,

v.

SILI NEUTRACEUTICALS, LLC, and
BRIAN MCDAID, individually and doing
business as KAYCON LTD,
Defendants.

PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITH ASSET FREEZE, OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
MIDWEST REGION
55 West Monroe Street, Suite 1825
Chicago, IL 60603-5701

Steven Wernikoff
Staff Attorney
Direct Dial
[REDACTED]

August 13, 2007

VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY

Michael W. Dobbins
Clerk of Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Everett McKinley Dirksen Building
219 South Dearborn Street, 20th floor
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Re: FTC v. Sili Neutracutical et al.
Civ. No. 07C 4541

Dear Mr. Dobbins:

Pursuant to telephonic notice from the attorney for the plaintiff, Steve Werenikoff, the defendants were served on 8/14/2007. The complaint/case is hereby unsealed.

/s/David H. Coar
David H. Coar, U.S. District Judge

Hearing held on emergency motion to file under seal. Motion is granted. Ex Parte motion for temporary restraining order is granted as modified. Each defendant is to appear before Judge Coar, on 8/27/2007 at 9:00 AM,, and show cause why the Court should not enter a preliminary injunction. Status hearing, before Judge Coar, set to 8/22/2007 at 9:00 AM.