Mickey Chandler's SpamSuite

The judge in this case has ruled for Quinstreet.

The determinations here were that Ferguson did qualify as an Interactive Service Provider for the purposes of CAN-SPAM, but did not suffer an "adverse effect" as contemplated by the statute. The Court also ruled that the Washington State anti-spam law is pre-empted by CAN-SPAM.

Here is Ferguson's Reply to Quinstreet's Response in opposition to his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

Here is Quinstreet's response to Ferguson's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

Here is Ferguson's motion for partial summary judgment.

Here is Quinstreet's reply to Ferguson's opposition to their Motion for Summary Judgment.

Here is Ferguson's response to Quinstreet's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Here is Quinstreet's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Having released everyone from the case except for Quinstreet, cross-motions for summary judgment were filed. Quinstreet filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and Ferguson filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

I guess the money for all of this litigation is starting to run low. e360 is cutting this lawsuit loose with a voluntary motion to dismiss WITH PREJUDICE (meaning that they cannot refile the case later if they change their minds).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited
Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT,
an individual,
Plaintiffs,

v.

MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
SUSAN WILSON A.K.A. SUSAN GUNN, an
individual, and KELLY CHIEN, an individual,
Defendants.

JOINT STATUS REPORT