SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
FergusonStatus ReportIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited v. MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual, JOINT STATUS REPORT
MOTION to DismissIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC an Illinois Limited v. MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
Stipulation Extending Deadline for Expert DisclosuresUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARK FERGUSON, a married individual, v. ACTIVE RESPONSE GROUP, a New York
Stipulation Dismissing Nautilus, Inc.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARK FERGUSON, a married v. ACTIVE RESPONSE GROUP, an
Stipulation Dismissing The Bradford Exchange LTDUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARK FERGUSON, a married v. ACTIVE RESPONSE GROUP, an
ComplaintIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
e360Insight LLC, et al. v. Ferguson, et al. (III)Not content to only launch a goofball suit against Comcast last week, David Linhardt, by and through e360Insight LLC, is suing Mark Ferguson, Susan Wilson, and Kelly Chien for a third time. Suit was filed on January 18, 2008. This lawsuit alleges defamation, tortious interference with a prospective business advantage, and tortious interference with a contract. In other words: "WAAAAAAA! THEY SAID MEAN THINGS ABOUT ME IN PUBLIC!"
ANSWER of The Bradford ExchangeHere's the Bradford Exchange's Answer to the lawsuit. The affirmative defenses are interesting. Most of the affirmative defenses are prophylactic in nature (they're there just in case, because failure to assert a defense is a waiver of the defense). Here, in Texas, those don't carry much weight because, by and large, not only must you assert the defense, you must actually pursue the defense.
STIPULATION Dismissing Vision Care HoldingUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARK FERGUSON, a married v. ACTIVE RESPONSE GROUP, a New STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT: STIPULATION
ANSWER QuinstreetWould you like to know what keeps me going at this? What makes a lawsuit interesting enough to me to track? What keeps me looking at lawsuits and turning PDF documents into text for your reading pleasure. Sheer incompetence.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationUser login |
Recent comments
1 week 2 hours ago
3 weeks 1 day ago
4 weeks 17 hours ago
6 weeks 4 days ago
9 weeks 3 days ago
10 weeks 2 days ago
11 weeks 4 days ago
11 weeks 5 days ago
14 weeks 6 days ago
15 weeks 3 days ago