SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
ReidtDISMISSAL With Leave to AmendAs predicted, Gordon v. Virtumundo rears its ugly head. This time, it's a motion to dismiss brought by the judge himself. The judge here raises the issue of whether Brosnan qualifies as a service provider with the ability to bring the lawsuit. As a result of the issue raised, the judge is dismissing the suit, but says that if Brosnan amends his lawsuit to show that he's actually a service provider and has actually suffered a loss, then the case can move forward. ================================== ComplaintThis is the complaint in this case. It alleges:
Brosnan v. Alki Mortgage, et al. [DISMISSED w/leave to amend]On August 22, 2007, John Brosnan filed a lawsuit against Alki Mortgage, Brian McKee, and Dylan Reidt. The lawsuit alleges violations of the CAN-SPAM Act.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationUser login |
Recent comments
1 week 2 days ago
2 weeks 1 day ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 5 days ago
10 weeks 22 hours ago
12 weeks 1 day ago
13 weeks 1 day ago