Support the SiteLinks and Supporters |
e360 v SpamhausRuling on Various MotionsHere is Judge Kocoras's ruling on Spamhaus's Motion to Exclude the January 2009 Affidavit of David Linhardt, Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of David Linhardt, and Motion for Summary Judgment.
Motion to Strike Affidavit of David LinhardtIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT e360 INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, a company
Reply to Response to Motion in Limine to Exclude Damages Opinion Testimony of David LinhardtIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT e360 INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, a company
Reply to Response to Motion for Summary Judgment on DamagesIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT e360 INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, a company
Response to Motion in Limine to Exclude Damages Opinion Testimony of David LinhardtIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT,
Response to Motion for Summary Judgment on DamagesIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT,
Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine to Exclude Damages Opinion Testimony of David LinhardtAgain, these documents are far more interesting than the actual motion is. And again, the redactions make it kind of pointless to copy it here to text.
Motion in Limine to Exclude Damages Opinion Testimony of David LinhardtIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT e360 INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, a company
Memorandum in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment on DamagesThis is actually more interesting than the motion itself. This lays out the reasons for Spamhaus' motion and why they think it means that they should win. However, the redactions in the document render it useless for copying here. You'll just have to get the documents yourself.
Motion for Summary Judgment on DamagesHere is Spamhaus's Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages. These documents basically ask the judge to rule in Spamhaus' favor because (surprise!) e360Insight and David Linhardt can't actually prove their damages to a "reasonable certainty" as demanded by the 7th Circuit. =========================== IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
|
Subscribe to SpamsuiteUpcoming DatesNavigationUser login |
Recent comments
7 weeks 2 days ago
7 weeks 2 days ago
31 weeks 11 hours ago
31 weeks 12 hours ago
31 weeks 1 day ago
38 weeks 2 days ago
41 weeks 1 day ago
43 weeks 1 day ago
45 weeks 6 days ago
45 weeks 6 days ago