SpamSuite.com

I debated how many of these documents to OCR and put up text versions of. Ultimately, I've decided to just do this one. The actual motion to dismiss merely states that it is a motion to dismiss and refers the court to this document and the affidavit. The affidavit merely restates things that you can read here. So, this one it is.

=======================================

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited
Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT,
an individual,
Plaintiffs,

v.

MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
SUSAN WILSON A.K.A. SUSAN GUNN, an
individual, and KELLY CHIEN, an individual,
Defendants.

JOINT STATUS REPORT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC an Illinois Limited
Liability Company, and DAVID LINDHARDT,
an individual,
Plaintiffs,

v.
MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
SUSAN WILSON, an individual, KELLY
CHIEN, are individual,
Defendants,

MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited
Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT,
an individual,
Plaintiffs,
v.

MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
SUSAN WILSON A.K.A. SUSAN GUNN, an
individual, and KELLY CHIEN, an individual,
Defendants.

Not content to only launch a goofball suit against Comcast last week, David Linhardt, by and through e360Insight LLC, is suing Mark Ferguson, Susan Wilson, and Kelly Chien for a third time.

Suit was filed on January 18, 2008.

This lawsuit alleges defamation, tortious interference with a prospective business advantage, and tortious interference with a contract.

In other words: "WAAAAAAA! THEY SAID MEAN THINGS ABOUT ME IN PUBLIC!"

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

E360 Insight

v.

Ferguson, et al.

ORDER

The matter coming to be heard on Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue, due notice having been given and the Court being advised of the premise, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Plaintiffs shall have 21 days, or until August 10, 2007, to file and serve upon the Defendant its Response to the Motion to Transfer Venue.

2. The Defendant shall have 14 days, or until August 24, 2007, to file and serve upon the Plaintiff his Reply.

This should be a copy of a motion to change venue.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited
Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT,
and individual,
Plaintiffs,

v.

MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
SUSAN WILSON A.K.A. SUSAN GUNN, an
individual, ROB SAECKER A.K.A. FUDO, an
individual, RICH TIETJENS A.K.A.
MORELY DOTES, an individual, WILLIAM
SILVERSTEIN, an individual, and TIM
SKIRVIN, an individual
Defendants.

REPLY BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

This is e360's Response to Ferguson's Motion to Dismiss

This is Robert Saecker's Reply to e360's Response to his motion to dismiss.

The tone of this summed up in the following quote from the Conclusion:

"Plaintiffs rely upon a fringe minority opinion from a foreign jurisdiction and wrap that unusual piece of jurisprudence with incomplete and inaccurate positions of Illinois case law to bolster their argument that Illinois can assert personal jurisdiction over Saecker."