SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
ComcastRuling on Motion to DismissIt's not going to be a good day for you anytime that a ruling starts off by calling your request "largely misguided". Reply to Response to MOTION to DismissWell, we will have to wait an see what happens in this case. e360 has finally managed to bring some colorable caselaw to bear on its case. Most of it is persuasive (meaning "non-binding" rather than "Oh man!
RESPONSE to Motion to DismissIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CORPORATION, v. E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Minute Entry DENYING Motion to ReconsiderRaise your hand if you're shocked by this one, but the Judge has denied e360Insight's Motion to Reconsider. ========================
MOTION to Reconsider05/01/2008 - 10:15 America/Chicago When a federal district court judge says that a bunch of people might call you a spammer, then your honor must be defended! And so e360Insight, LLC, is asking the judge to pretty please take that back and let them have a case and discovery.
MOTION to Dismiss04/24/2008 - 10:15 America/Chicago David Linhardt, and his various sock puppets, are now trying to dismiss Comcast's countersuit and 3rd party complaints. Among the complaints he makes is that Comcast did not attach even one single email to the complaint. That strikes me as a dangerous demand to make. I think that he could end up with reams of paper as a result. But, we'll have to wait and see.
Memorandum Opinion and Order GRANTING Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsWell, we predicted this would happen. And so it has. Comcast has § 230 immunity from liability on everything. Even if they didn't, e360 failed to file any CREDIBLE claims against Comcast. They've been pretty much laughed out of court. The first paragraph sets the tone. If you were pulling for e360 on this one then it doesn't get any better from there.
Comcast's Reply to e360's Response to Comcast's Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CORPORATION, v. E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Counterclaim and Third Party ComplaintThe bar for this was pretty low, and so, to no one's surprise, it was granted. Thus, we have a repeat document. The Counterclaim and 3rd Party Complaint is no longer a proposed document. Comcast is now officially counter-suing e360Insight as well as David Linhardt and all of the socks in his drawers. ===============================
ORDER on MOTION for Leave to FileMINUTE entry before Judge Honorable James B. Zagel:Motion for leave to amend pleadings and to add counterclaim and third party complaint 28 is granted.Mailed notice (drw, ) (Entered: 03/24/2008) COUNTERCLAIM filed by Comcast Corporation against E360Insight, LLC.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationUser login |
Recent comments
1 week 2 days ago
2 weeks 1 day ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 5 days ago
10 weeks 22 hours ago
12 weeks 1 day ago
13 weeks 1 day ago