Comcast

Answer to Counter Claims and Third Party Claims

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Plaintiff, v.
COMCAST CORPORATION,
Defendant.
________________________________________

COMCAST CORPORATION,
Counterclaimant, v.
E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Counterdefendant, and

Scheduling Order

Here's the scheduling order for the case. It's not difficult to comply with from a time standpoint, but he's also indicating that he will be hard-nosed about the time-line: "This schedule will not be altered/amended."

====================

MINUTE entry before the Honorable David H. Coar:

Review of Judge Zagel's Orders

After denying e360's attempt to reboot this case, Judge Zagel decided to review all of the non-routine matters (in other words, substantive rulings). The following is his decision concerning the merits of e360's request to get a mulligan: "Having reviewed each of these rulings, the court finds no compelling reason to revisit them.

Order on Motion to Vacate All Prior Orders

Can you say "grounds for appeal"?

I knew you could.

Judge Coar has denied e360's request to give the case a reboot. I think it's a good call on his part, but you can be certain that e360 will seek to get this decision overturned, probably in an interlocutory appeal.

====================

Reply to Response to Motion to Vacate All Prior Orders

Here is e360's counter-argument to Comcast's response to their request that this case receive a reboot.

============================================
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Plaintiff,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION,
Defendant.
________________________________________

COMCAST CORPORATION,
Counterclaimant,

v.

Response to Motion to Vacate All Prior Orders

Here's Comcast's response to e360's attempt to revive the dead corpse of its case against Comcast.

Hearing on MOTION to Vacate All Prior Orders

11/19/2008 09:00
America/Chicago

MINUTE entry before the Honorable David H. Coar:Motion hearing held on 10/16/2008 regarding motion to vacate, 67 . Set deadlines/hearing as to motion to vacate, 67 : Responses due by 11/5/2008 (no reply). Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2008 at 09:00 AM. as to Motion to vacate.

Response Due

11/05/2008 17:00
America/Chicago

MINUTE entry before the Honorable David H. Coar:Motion hearing held on 10/16/2008 regarding motion to vacate, 67 . Set deadlines/hearing as to motion to vacate, 67 : Responses due by 11/5/2008 (no reply). Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2008 at 09:00 AM. as to Motion to vacate.

MOTION to Vacate All Prior Orders

Everyone has pretty much seen this one coming. E360Insight is asking the new judge to vacate all prior rulings in the case because of a conflict of interest.

Syndicate content