Home

Maverick Direct Marketing Solutions

Ruling on Motion to Dismiss

It's not going to be a good day for you anytime that a ruling starts off by calling your request "largely misguided".

Reply to Response to MOTION to Dismiss

Well, we will have to wait an see what happens in this case. e360 has finally managed to bring some colorable caselaw to bear on its case. Most of it is persuasive (meaning "non-binding" rather than "Oh man!

RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Plaintiff,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION,
Defendant.

COMCAST CORPORATION,
Counterclaimant,

v.

E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Counterdefendant,
DAVID LINHARDT,
MAVERICK DIRECT MARKETING
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
BARGAIN DEPOT ENTERPRISES, LLC,
d/b/a bargaindepot.net and
bargainshoppecorp.com,

MOTION to Dismiss

04/24/2008 - 10:15
America/Chicago

David Linhardt, and his various sock puppets, are now trying to dismiss Comcast's countersuit and 3rd party complaints. Among the complaints he makes is that Comcast did not attach even one single email to the complaint. That strikes me as a dangerous demand to make. I think that he could end up with reams of paper as a result. But, we'll have to wait and see.

Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint

The bar for this was pretty low, and so, to no one's surprise, it was granted. Thus, we have a repeat document. The Counterclaim and 3rd Party Complaint is no longer a proposed document. Comcast is now officially counter-suing e360Insight as well as David Linhardt and all of the socks in his drawers.

===============================
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Syndicate content